The Luxury of Being Single

Getty Images

Not long ago, being single was treated as both temporary and vaguely undesirable, an in-between state you were expected to outgrow while waiting for the “real” architecture of your life to begin. By twenty-one, that expectation already feels familiar, almost ambient. Yet in 2026, the framing is beginning to read as outdated. Singleness no longer signals absence so much as access to time, space, money, and, perhaps most importantly, choice. Independence has not become aspirational because it is glamorous. It has become aspirational because it is increasingly difficult to sustain.

As a single woman in her early twenties, I see this shift play out in both my own life and the lives around me. My friends in relationships are not unhappy, but their lives are undeniably more structured. Apartments are chosen for shared affordability rather than individual preference. Schedules bend around one another. Decisions, even small ones, are negotiated. What appears, from the outside, as romance is often underpinned by something more practical: shared rent, shared expenses, shared emotional bandwidth. The relationship becomes not just a romantic bond, but a system of mutual maintenance.

By contrast, being single allows my life to retain its shape. I was able to move to New York City to pursue fashion school without factoring in how it would affect anyone else’s life, job, or routine. I can travel without coordinating calendars. I can make decisions impulsively, whether that means booking a last-minute trip or, more realistically, giving in to the very considered impulse to buy a piece of vintage designer clothing I absolutely do not need but will think about for weeks if I don’t. These freedoms, on their own, seem minor. Together, they create a life that feels expansive rather than compressed.

My contentment with being single is not rooted in detachment, but in awareness. This level of flexibility is not neutral. The ability to live alone, to make independent financial decisions, to absorb risk without immediate consequence, these are privileges. Singleness, in this sense, is not something I feel compelled to exit, but something that actively supports the scale of my ambitions. It allows me to move without hesitation, to prioritize without apology, and to build a life that feels fully my own.

This way of living is not entirely new. Samantha Jones was the blueprint. Her life was never structured around a relationship, but around her work, her friendships, and her independence. Relationships existed within that, not the other way around.

What once felt excessive now feels familiar. The idea that a woman can move through her life without centering a relationship no longer reads as radical, but as realistic. Not as a rejection of love, but as a refusal to structure a life around it.

Culturally, there is a subtle shift in what feels aspirational. Publicly centering a relationship no longer carries the same weight it once did, particularly at a moment when autonomy, mobility, and self-direction are more visibly valued. The emphasis has moved, quietly but clearly, toward lives that feel self-authored. The shift is not a rejection of intimacy, but a recalibration of what is placed at the center.

Money, of course, alters the equation entirely. Financial security removes urgency. It means you do not have to settle for a relationship, a city, or a version of your life that feels smaller than what you want. You can wait. You can be selective without pressure. You can leave situations that do not add something meaningful because you are not relying on them to stabilize your life. In that sense, independence is not just emotional, it is infrastructural.

I see the contrast constantly. Friends in relationships often make compromises earlier, sometimes without fully registering them as such. Single women with stability tend to move more slowly, more deliberately. The difference is not a matter of emotional capacity or openness to intimacy. It is a matter of structural freedom. Being single allows autonomy to remain intact unless, and until, you consciously choose otherwise.

I don’t think of being single as a statement, or even as an identity. I think of it as a logistical advantage. It simplifies my life in ways that are difficult to relinquish once you’ve experienced them. And for now, at least, I see no reason to trade that in.